Hello Sunrise,
many thanks for your (anonymous) feedback.
<Offtopic>
Ok, I have not seen this other discussion - and simply I do NOT want to
start this "relegious" discussion about it.
For me personally it is "bad behaviour" to use RFC1918 in internet public
based services / routes.
For sure others CAN do, because it is not strictly forbidden.
This is for me also a general "problem" according RFC's:
what is "MUST" and what is "SHOULD"....
So I stop it here.
</Offtopic>
Back to my case:
Here see the traces which use RFC1918 in your backbone.
So you assign it ! Or may send me an introduction why I am wrong.
May I missed something.
Many thanks in advance,
Best Regards
Stephan
remark:
192.168.12.254 is your CPE / Fritzbox
/root: traceroute local.ch
traceroute to local.ch (185.101.119.163), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 192.168.12.254 (192.168.12.254) 0.826 ms 0.650 ms 0.559 ms
2 10.136.71.241 (10.136.71.241) 18.020 ms 18.421 ms 18.051 ms
3 172.16.19.146 (172.16.19.146) 22.824 ms 22.594 ms 20.392 ms
4 172.16.19.145 (172.16.19.145) 20.397 ms 23.046 ms 22.561 ms
5 194.230.108.185 (194.230.108.185) 18.058 ms 19.911 ms 19.526 ms
6 * * *
7 * * *
8 oer02pe05.ge1-0-19.bb.sunrise.net (212.161.250.138) 20.847 ms
oer02pe05.ge1-0-0.bb.sunrise.net (212.161.250.134) 22.801 ms 22.368 ms
9 195.141.229.234 (195.141.229.234) 22.636 ms 22.517 ms 22.724 ms
10 * * *
11 * * *
(snip)
/root: traceroute -I local.ch
traceroute to local.ch (185.101.119.163), 64 hops max, 48 byte packets
1 192.168.12.254 (192.168.12.254) 0.682 ms 0.543 ms 0.506 ms
2 10.136.71.241 (10.136.71.241) 18.382 ms 20.533 ms 17.602 ms
3 172.16.19.146 (172.16.19.146) 22.372 ms 22.011 ms 22.478 ms
4 172.16.19.145 (172.16.19.145) 21.672 ms 21.664 ms 22.113 ms
5 194.230.108.185 (194.230.108.185) 19.564 ms 19.532 ms 19.533 ms
6 * * *
7 * * *
8 oer02pe05.ge1-0-19.bb.sunrise.net (212.161.250.138) 22.131 ms 22.230
ms 21.965 ms
9 195.141.229.234 (195.141.229.234) 21.793 ms 22.007 ms 21.611 ms
10 * * *
11 * * *
(snip)
>tracert local.ch
Routenverfolgung zu local.ch [185.101.119.163]
über maximal 30 Hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms 1 ms 192.168.12.254
2 18 ms 17 ms 18 ms 10.136.71.241
3 23 ms 22 ms 22 ms 172.16.19.146
4 23 ms 23 ms 22 ms 172.16.19.145
5 24 ms 20 ms 20 ms 194.230.108.185
6 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
7 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
8 87 ms 85 ms 83 ms oer02pe05.ge1-0-19.bb.sunrise.net
[212.161.250.138]
9 87 ms 86 ms 79 ms 195.141.229.234
10 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
11 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
(snip)
Inbound:
(snip)
....
6 e1-19.c-r1.es34.nine.ch (5.148.160.143) 12.509 ms 11.148 ms 11.102 ms
7 194.230.36.32 (194.230.36.32) 1.271 ms 1.261 ms 1.214 ms
8 * * *
9 zur01are02.et-10-3-0.bb.sunrise.net (195.141.217.155) 1.355 ms 1.225
ms 1.088 ms
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 adsl-84-227-50-245.adslplus.ch (84.227.50.245) 22.971 ms 23.458 ms
23.962 ms
2016-08-16 13:44 GMT+02:00 peering <[email protected]>:
> Hi
> Based on the current post at the swinog mailing list and a previous one
> which discussed the topic in detail. In fact there is no obligation to not
> use private IP Addresses for internet based Services.
> Therefore be aware, that the seen RFC1918 Addresses has not been assigned
> by sunrise.
> Many Thanks for your understanding
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
