Ok, I think this discussion is drifting a little bit. I understand your point and I find the thought process interesting. If you wish to continue this conversation, we can always do so off-list or around a beer in Lausanne.
Maybe my initial request was ambiguous so I will attempt to clarify it. The question we’re asking here is : Out of the people who have tried FortiVM solution, do you have feedback to share and have you encountered any limitations or problems with it ? Antoine On 23/04/15 09:37, "Jeroen Massar" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 2015-04-23 09:32, Antoine Benkemoun-Andre wrote: >> That’s a very good remark :) >> >> As I mentioned previously, we’re presently fully standardised on their >> appliances (physical so far) and have no particular complaints about it >>so >> we see no reason why we should not continue this way. In our opinion, >> standardisation has quite a lot of value. > >You are talking about mono-culture and vendor lock-in. >Those have little to do with standardization. > >Also note that from a perspective of most admins, mono-culture is bad, >as that means if one thing is broken, everything is broken, while >diversity would mean that a bug might not affect all things. > >On the flip-side though, having only one thing to support does mean less >overhead; and if you are thinking about "cloud" firewalls, well, nothing >much can be helped there IMHO... > >Without requirements (which could include "team is 1 person big, hence, >not going to bother with multiple things" or "we have zero budget" or >"management already decided" ;) little anybody can say if something is >good or bad though. > >Greets, > Jeroen > > > >_______________________________________________ >swinog mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
