-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We run BIDI SFP on all the 100mbit ports.
They are all the same switches, M3400 We have "end user" CPE that complete the 1410/1390nm BIDI 100baseBX But I have some local stuff that goes only 10 rack units in the same room, and I would prefer not to have to install a CPE to cross 50 CM but rather use an SX Fibre instead (the SX SFP on the other end is already there, currently to a (to be replaced) Alcatel switch Does this help a bit? This is a FTTH installation with some local stuff in the Central office. I prefer to have it with as few hops as possible. LG Silvan Am 22.11.2012 16:04, schrieb [email protected]: > Silvan: > > Well, you said you had the all SFP switch with the 2 gig uplinks > completing the ring of 5 switches and having only 24 Fast Ethernet > ports with SFP capability available....how were you intending to > use these ports ? Why do you say your cpe devices are not > appropriate? Also are the ring of switches all the same make/model? > What are the 24 100mbit ports on that last switch NOT doing? Please > bring some more details of your plan if you would. Are all switches > running same config and IOS verson and feature set? > > Regards, > > Vinnie > > > -----Original Message----- *From:* Silvan Gebhardt > [mailto:[email protected]] *Sent:* Thursday, November 22, > 2012 02:37 PM *To:* [email protected] *Cc:* > [email protected], 'Frederic Gargula' *Subject:* Re: [swinog] Yet > another "need hardware now" - 100mbit SFP > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 so basically what I > have is the all SFP Switch, with 24 Fibre Ports on FastEthernet and > 2 Gigabit Ports. Gigabit is all taken since we have 5 switches in a > ring. Therefore I have some situation where my CPE is not > appropriate and I wanted to use SX or LX fibre there. 1000BASE TX > do not work. Best Silvan Am 22.11.2012 13:08, schrieb > [email protected]: > Frederic: > > You are quite right, I > stand corrected! The 3400g-2cs has only two > 10/100/1000 ports and > the 3400g-12cs has 12 such ports. My main > point was that these > switches support SFP on other than uplink > ports and the me > 3400-24ts does not. Thanks for the correction. > Best Regards, > > > Vinnie > > > -----Original Message----- *From:* Frederic Gargula > > [mailto:[email protected]] *Sent:* Thursday, November 22, > > 2012 12:03 PM *To:* [email protected] *Cc:* 'Silvan > > Gebhardt', [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [swinog] Yet another > > "need hardware now" - 100mbit SFP > > Hello, ME 3400G-2CS has only > 2 10/100/1000 ports. Best regards, > Frederic Gargula IP-Max On Nov > 22, 2012, at 11:58 AM, > [email protected] wrote: > Hi > Silvan: > > Hope you are > doing well. It looks like there is only > one model of these switches > that supports SFP on the 100mbit > ports. That model is ME 3400-24FS. > It supports SFP on the 100mbit > ports and on the 2 gbit uplink > ports. > > The other switch from > this platform that has only > 10/100mbit ports (ME 3400-24TS) only > supports SFP on the 2 gigabit > uplink ports. > > The remainder of > the switches in this series: >>> ME 3400G-12CS > ME 3400G-2CS > > > Both have 24 10/100/1000 Dual > purpose ports that support SFP and > RJ45. I hope this helps. Best > Regards, > > Vinniw Watson > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Silvan Gebhardt > [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: > Thursday, November 22, > 2012 10:54 AM > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [swinog] Yet > another "need hardware now" - 100mbit SFP > > > -----BEGIN PGP > SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Folks, I have an > ME3400. I need > SFP that work on the 100mbit ports, I need 1x LX 2x > SX OR: 3x > 100mbit Copper please note, the fastethernet ports on > this switch > do not accept the 100BASE-SX or LX from cisco at all. > anyone that > can help me out with SFP that work in that cisco switch > please > contact me offlist with a good offer. Best Silvan -----BEGIN > PGP > SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: > Using > GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlCt9msACgkQC82WwYR1u2qv/ACgm/SF7Q5hyfEDPlnlqybLbhVo > > x0sAn1tVIo2VXa0HZyYlKbNo/zxv0l3J =zFfO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > swinog > mailing > list >> [email protected] > > > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog -----BEGIN > PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: > Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ > iEYEARECAAYFAlCuKqwACgkQC82WwYR1u2ockwCfbeUrmdfFo6wOJwtyF5PrbaKJ > eZQAn3ikeZemYNxxkonnAe/+bdvgHGzs =gXFz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlCuQv0ACgkQC82WwYR1u2rR7QCgjjHg5Z0GPEkJ64cmhjQGUf9b PTwAoIw/7z9MSmkZdeuRXtZyc+f8w9aH =Hy7y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift
_______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
