Doesnt matter. Switch is only following the rules in the law. Now we can argue if its a good law or not. And we can launch a public voting for this in switzerland (not like in germany)
On 13.08.2012, at 21:47, Oliver Schad <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:55:04 +0200 > Guillaume Leclanche <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think the law makes a good job of delimiting the cases where the >> block can be done. In addition, I think Switch makes a good job >> applying this law. >> I'd be happy that switch blocks one of my domains to prevent me >> from being sued for damages by some infected people. > > If the entities domain owner, server owner and service owner are the > same - no problem. > > You want that your email communication is blocked because one of your > clients has a client that hosts a vulnerable PHP application? Come on. > > Regards > Oli > > > _______________________________________________ > swinog mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
