I saw one of these before Joe’s change went in. It might be more non-determinism with archetypes...
> On Jan 30, 2017, at 3:11 PM, Michael Ilseman via swift-dev > <swift-dev@swift.org> wrote: > > Joe, could this be due to your changes? > > Assertion failed: ((inContext->isEqual(repInContext) || inContext->hasError() > || repInContext->hasError()) && "Potential archetype mapping differs from > representative!"), function operator(), file > /Users/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/swift/lib/AST/ArchetypeBuilder.cpp, > line 2205. > 0 swift 0x000000010c8397c8 > llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) + 40 > 1 swift 0x000000010c839e76 SignalHandler(int) + 454 > 2 libsystem_platform.dylib 0x00007fffa8173bba _sigtramp + 26 > 3 libsystem_platform.dylib 000000000000000000 _sigtramp + 1474872416 > 4 libsystem_c.dylib 0x00007fffa7ffa420 abort + 129 > 5 libsystem_c.dylib 0x00007fffa7fc1893 basename_r + 0 > 6 swift 0x000000010a4233ea > swift::ArchetypeBuilder::getGenericEnvironment(swift::GenericSignature*) + > 1962 > 7 swift 0x000000010a3b4412 (anonymous > namespace)::DeclChecker::visitFuncDecl(swift::FuncDecl*) + 3074 > 8 swift 0x000000010a3a4430 (anonymous > namespace)::DeclChecker::visit(swift::Decl*) + 576 > 9 swift 0x000000010a3b090b (anonymous > namespace)::DeclChecker::visitExtensionDecl(swift::ExtensionDecl*) + 555 > 10 swift 0x000000010a3a42ac (anonymous > namespace)::DeclChecker::visit(swift::Decl*) + 188 > 11 swift 0x000000010a3a41e4 > swift::TypeChecker::typeCheckDecl(swift::Decl*, bool) + 100 > 12 swift 0x000000010a415814 > swift::performTypeChecking(swift::SourceFile&, swift::TopLevelContext&, > swift::OptionSet<swift::TypeCheckingFlags, unsigned int>, unsigned int, > unsigned int) + 1444 > 13 swift 0x000000010a02d059 > swift::CompilerInstance::performSema() + 3897 > 14 swift 0x00000001095d2d1c > swift::performFrontend(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*, > swift::FrontendObserver*) + 4380 > 15 swift 0x0000000109591790 main + 3312 > 16 libdyld.dylib 0x00007fffa7f66255 start + 1 > > > >> On Jan 30, 2017, at 3:07 PM, no-re...@swift.org <mailto:no-re...@swift.org> >> wrote: >> >> New issue found! >> >> [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx [#8155] >> >> Build URL: https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/8155/ >> <https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/8155/> >> Project: oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx >> Date of build: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:58:16 -0800 >> Build duration: 8 min 58 sec >> Identified problems: >> >> Assertion failure: This build failed because of an assertion failure. Below >> is a list of all errors in the build log: >> Indication 1 >> <https://ci.swift.org//job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/8155/consoleFull#-417162413c38edd5a-00f9-40a2-abac-1db59f7a90ca> >> Changes >> >> Commit 70701e38e59623045b40f5c9472504dd5cf0fecd by enderby: >> Change the llvm-obdump(1) behavior with the -macho flag and >> >> edit: test/tools/llvm-objdump/malformed-macho.test >> edit: test/Object/macho-invalid.test >> edit: tools/llvm-objdump/MachODump.cpp >> >> Commit da9c636e9dfd1dd2fdd6535b5cf377e4196cd851 by jgroff: >> Sema: Improve handling of potential witnesses during associated type >> >> edit: lib/Sema/TypeCheckProtocol.cpp >> >> Commit 34ec424898908c098652d92bf305e4fe9a52e168 by jgroff: >> stdlib: Adding missing default implementations of >> >> edit: stdlib/public/core/RangeReplaceableCollection.swift.gyb >> add: test/stdlib/collection-combinatorics.swift.gyb >> edit: stdlib/public/core/MutableCollection.swift > > _______________________________________________ > swift-dev mailing list > swift-dev@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
_______________________________________________ swift-dev mailing list swift-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
