Hi Brian, I know you sent this out 7 days ago, but thanks very much for doing this!
Ted > On Nov 7, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Brian Gesiak via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org> > wrote: > > Hello all, > > The latest LLVM Weekly <http://llvmweekly.org/issue/149 > <http://llvmweekly.org/issue/149>> featured a blog post by some folks who > make a static analyzer named PVS-Studio. They published a blog post > <http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0446/ <http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0446/>> of the > errors they encountered in the LLVM project. Although the report contained > many false positives > <https://twitter.com/chandlerc1024/status/794442485472706563 > <https://twitter.com/chandlerc1024/status/794442485472706563>>, some did lead > to code improvements. > > I tried running the analyzer on the Swift codebase; here are the results: > https://gist.github.com/modocache/00eb437ca3cac84960992cdc23fa0f52 > <https://gist.github.com/modocache/00eb437ca3cac84960992cdc23fa0f52> > > It's a little hard to read, but there are some legitimate issues in the > report. For example, line #709 in lib/IDE/TypeReconstruction.cpp returns > 'false' for a method that has a return type of 'size_t', which is probably > incorrect. > > If you're interested in contributing to Swift, why not start by fixing some > of these warnings? :) > > - Brian Gesiak > > _______________________________________________ > swift-dev mailing list > swift-dev@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
_______________________________________________ swift-dev mailing list swift-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
