> On May 3, 2016, at 10:40, Karl Wagner via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>> On 2 May 2016, at 18:42, Joseph Bell <j...@iachieved.it
>> <mailto:j...@iachieved.it>> wrote:
>>
>> Karl,
>>
>> A number of us are on Slack working with ARM support - would you like an
>> invite?
>>
>> Joe
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> yes that would nice.
>
> The modulemap issue can be fixed by adding a -resource-dir flag. Going with a
> comment in AddSwift.cmake, I switched the include fag to the library output
> directory to "-resource-dir”, but then SwiftShims wouldn’t build. So I
> changed the flag back to a standard include and make it *also* specify
> “-resource-dir” on cross-compile (so the cross command has both -I and
> -resource-dir). Now the native host builds, but the cross-compiled stdlib
> won’t because of the same SwiftShims issue.
>
> So I need to look at how the compiler uses -resource-dir what’s going on with
> SwiftShims.
-resource-dir covers everything in lib/swift/. I'm not sure we're properly set
up to handle more than one architecture on Linux, though: we still link against
the .so's in lib/swift/linux/ rather than lib/swift/linux/$ARCH, despite "fat"
libraries not being sensible here. Maybe that's the way to go: reorganize
lib/swift/linux/ so that there's nothing that's not in an architecture-specific
subdirectory.
Meanwhile, you can probably get things off the ground by copying or symlinking
everything in lib/swift/ that's not in lib/swift/linux/ into your custom
resource directory. (I think that's just the shims/ folder right now.)
Jordan
_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev