Lang is, he was helping me write the LLVM tests, but I'm stacked at the moment.

> On Apr 16, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Michael Gottesman <mgottes...@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Apr 16, 2016, at 2:23 PM, William Dillon <will...@housedillon.com 
>> <mailto:will...@housedillon.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> What LLVM are you using?
>> 
>> You have to use the one from my github (and the arm branch) or it won't work:
>> 
>> https://github.com/hpux735/swift-llvm/tree/arm 
>> <https://github.com/hpux735/swift-llvm/tree/arm> 
>> 
>> I haven't had time to upstream the changes to LLVM.
> 
> I am not actually involved in this discussion beyond ensuring that Lang who 
> works in this area is aware of it.
> 
>> 
>> - Will
>> 
>>> On Apr 16, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Michael Gottesman via swift-dev 
>>> <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> +CC Lang Hames (Just in case)
>>>> On Apr 15, 2016, at 6:45 PM, Joe Groff via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org 
>>>> <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 15, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Timothy Wood via swift-dev 
>>>>> <swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I was able to get Swift running on my Raspberry Pi using a variant of the 
>>>>> instructions at 
>>>>> <http://dev.iachieved.it/iachievedit/open-source-swift-on-raspberry-pi-2/ 
>>>>> <http://dev.iachieved.it/iachievedit/open-source-swift-on-raspberry-pi-2/>>
>>>>>  but sadly the packages I’ve found haven’t been updated for Swift 2.2 (so 
>>>>> things like `associatedtype` don’t work nicely between Mac and Linux).
>>>>> 
>>>>> So, I thought I’d try building from source again hoping that the previous 
>>>>> failure was resolved. But I’m still hitting the unimplemented relocation 
>>>>> issue in LLVM’s RuntimeDyldELF.cpp, in 
>>>>> RuntimeDyldELF::resolveARMRelocation(), where the relocation type that is 
>>>>> being requested is R_ARM_GOT_PREL.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I thought I read in my last go-round on this that this was a regression 
>>>>> in LLVM, but I’m not finding a pointer to this now, so maybe I’m 
>>>>> misremembering.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is there a trick to avoiding this issue in LLVM, or an existing patch 
>>>>> somewhere that I can cherry-pick?
>>>> 
>>>> What linker are you using? GNU ld 2.26 in particular changed the behavior 
>>>> of protected visibility in a way that's incompatible with our usage, and 
>>>> we haven't fully implemented a workaround. You might try using gold or an 
>>>> older binutils, if that's what you're currently using.
>>>> 
>>>> -Joe
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> swift-dev mailing list
>>>> swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev 
>>>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-dev mailing list
>>> swift-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev 
>>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev>
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

Reply via email to