Excellent! I'll begin working on this today. Austin
> On Apr 11, 2016, at 11:07 AM, Dave Abrahams <dabrah...@apple.com> wrote: > > > on Sun Apr 10 2016, Austin Zheng <austinzheng-AT-gmail.com > <http://austinzheng-at-gmail.com/>> wrote: > >> I'm really sorry for dropping the ball and disappearing off the list. I'd >> like >> to help out if I can. I'll check out the current branch tomorrow and see what >> the status of the work is, but let me know if everything is done >> already/there's >> something in particular that should be worked on. > > Dmitri may have other ideas, but one thing we haven't done is to take > advantage of the new model by removing references from indices. I'd > like to prove that the new model does what it's supposed to. You might > try simplifying the indices for Set and Dictionary. It should be > possible to represent them as a wrapper around an Int. > >> >> >> Austin >> >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Shawn Erickson <shaw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Anything I can help with on this effort? It looks like things are moving >> along among the Apple folks. Not sure how to jump in without stepping on >> in >> flight work, etc. >> >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:39 AM Dmitri Gribenko <griboz...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Shawn Erickson <shaw...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:49 PM Dmitri Gribenko <griboz...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> I just wanted to announce that we have sufficient change on the >>>> swift-3-indexing-model branch so that we can build the core standard >>>> library and StdlibUnittest. We achieved this by putting the protocol >>>> new structure into place, and stubbing out with fatalError() or just >>>> commenting out parts that didn't compile. Now we have a baseline that >>>> we won't regress, and we are starting to work towards improving it, >>>> making existing tests pass, and then writing new tests, and >> addressing >>>> TODOs and FIXMEs that we left in the code as we were doing the first >>>> pass. >>>> >>>> Here's the most recent pull request from Shawn where he starts to fix >>>> the tests: https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/1632 >>>> >>>> Now we are in the "massively-parallel" stage of this project and we, >>>> as always, welcome contributions to this branch! >>> >>> >>> FYI >>> >>> I am working on the following: >>> >>> FAIL: Swift :: 1_stdlib/StringDiagnostics.swift >>> FAIL: Swift :: 1_stdlib/StringDiagnostics_without_Foundation.swift >>> ...and looking at converting String.XxxxIndexes to the new index style >> while >>> maintaining existing public API. >> >> There doesn't seem to be many tests actively failing in the primary >> testsuite, so I'll be working on making StdlibCollectionUnittest >> compile, which will allow us to run the validation testsuite. >> >> Dmitri >> >> -- >> main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if >> (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <griboz...@gmail.com>*/ >> > > -- > Dave
_______________________________________________ swift-dev mailing list swift-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
