> On Dec 17, 2015, at 3:44 PM, Joe Groff via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Dec 17, 2015, at 3:43 PM, Greg Parker <gpar...@apple.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 17, 2015, at 3:34 PM, Joe Groff via swift-dev <swift-dev@swift.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On ARMv7 and ARM64, the argument and return register sets are the same
>> 
>> Nit: True on arm64. Not true on armv7; the GPR parameters are r0-r3 but GPR 
>> return is r0-r1.
> 
> True, I meant that one sequence is a prefix of the other. If you pass the 
> first argument in and return it out via {r0, r1} the operations could be done 
> in-place.

Also, Swift functions can have their own ABIs.  Extending the result registers 
to use r0-r3 on ARM32 seems perfectly reasonable.

-Chris
_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

Reply via email to