Thank you for sharing the information.
I could understand the current status of Swift bootstrapping.

> 2015/12/04 15:31、David Owens II <da...@owensd.io> のメール:
> 
> LLVM is usable from C APIs and can be used from within Swift. There might be 
> a few rough edges, but it’s doable. That said, it’s a lot of work to re-write 
> the compiler simply to bootstrap itself, and frankly, while the syntax of the 
> language is still in high flux, it would be a bit of a foolish task with very 
> little gain.
> 
> I could see it potentially happening later (or a small team to start on it 
> after v3), but there is so much missing from Swift right now that I don’t see 
> the team spending any significant amount of time to do work that won’t bring 
> any developer-facing features to the table.
> 
> -David
> 
>> On Dec 3, 2015, at 10:30 PM, David Owens II <owe...@fastmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> LLVM is usable from C APIs and can be used from within Swift. There might be 
>> a few rough edges, but it’s doable. That said, it’s a lot of work to 
>> re-write the compiler simply to bootstrap itself, and frankly, while the 
>> syntax of the language is still in high flux, it would be a bit of a foolish 
>> task with very little gain.
>> 
>> I could see it potentially happening later (or a small team to start on it 
>> after v3), but there is so much missing from Swift right now that I don’t 
>> see the team spending any significant amount of time to do work that won’t 
>> bring any developer-facing features to the table.
>> 
>> -David
>> 
>>> On Dec 3, 2015, at 9:35 PM, AlexDenisov <1101.deb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Swift is heavily depends on LLVM, which is written in C++.
>>> Seems it’s not going happen in the near future since there are no plans for 
>>> C++ <> Swift interoperability (yet?).
>>> --
>>> AlexDenisov
>>> Software Engineer, http://lowlevelbits.org
>>> 
>>>> On 04 Dec 2015, at 03:39, 出水 厚輝 <demmys.ats...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Is there any schedules or ideas concerning a bootstrapping Swift?
>>>> I think all Swift users have an ability to be a good committer, except for 
>>>> his/her skills in C++.
>>>> And also I think Swift can be the swiftest and most readable language in 
>>>> the future.
>>>> So isn't it natural to the Swift compiler to be self-hosted?
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you for your time.
>>>> 
>>>> - Atsuki_______________________________________________
>>>> swift-dev mailing list
>>>> swift-dev@swift.org
>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-dev mailing list
>>> swift-dev@swift.org
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
>> 
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

Reply via email to