BTW is anything blocking integrating SR-2416? https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/574
That allows value types to be archived too if they support _ObjectBridgeable (they’ll come back as reference types though). > On 27 Oct 2016, at 4:22 AM, Tony Parker via swift-corelibs-dev > <swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org> wrote: > > >> On Oct 26, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Max Desiatov <max.desia...@gmail.com >> <mailto:max.desia...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Tony, >> >> This is very interesting caveat. Is there a plan to get this documented >> anywhere? I haven't seen any documentation for Swift Foundation published >> publicly anywhere akin to how it's done for other APIs at >> https://developer.apple.com/reference/ >> <https://developer.apple.com/reference/>. >> >> With best regards, Max. > > With respect to the NSObject requirement: It’s really more of a known issue > than a permanent limitation. > > To over summarize the situation: NSKeyedArchiver (the Objective-C one) puts a > private category on NSObject and assumes all objects respond to those > messages after that. > > We don’t really have documentation for swift-corelibs-foundation beyond what > we can put in our own headerdoc format there. That would be something I would > really appreciate help on if anyone is interested in contributing. > > - Tony > >> >>> On 26 Oct 2016, at 18:11, Tony Parker via swift-corelibs-dev >>> <swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Sai, >>> >>> We do have basic support for keyed archiving and unarchiving in >>> swift-corelibs-foundation on Linux. The limitation is that the NSCoding >>> protocol cannot be applied to Swift struct types, only class types. On >>> Darwin, the class also must be a subclass of NSObject. This last limitation >>> may not exist on Linux, but you should be aware that if you encode a >>> non-NSObject subclass on Linux then you would not be able to decode it on >>> Darwin. >>> >>> - Tony >>> >>>> On Oct 26, 2016, at 4:07 AM, Sai Kanduri via swift-corelibs-dev >>>> <swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Tony, >>>> >>>> From your comments on Pull Request #574 I understand that we cannot >>>> archive/un-archive non-NS objects using NsKeyedArchiver & >>>> NSKeyedUnarchiver.I s my understanding correct ..? Does this means that >>>> archiving and un-archiving of swift types is not supported on Linux ? >>>> >>>> -Sai Hema >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> swift-corelibs-dev mailing list >>>> swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org> >>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev >>>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> swift-corelibs-dev mailing list >>> swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org> >>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev >>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev> >> > > _______________________________________________ > swift-corelibs-dev mailing list > swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev Luke Howard web <http://lukehoward.com/> / facebook <https://www.facebook.com/lukehowardmusic> / soundcloud <https://soundcloud.com/lukehoward/> / spotify <https://open.spotify.com/artist/3duTXsC49HoPt4f4EySDKf>
_______________________________________________ swift-corelibs-dev mailing list swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev
