> On May 27, 2016, at 10:05 AM, Brian Gesiak via swift-dev 
> <swift-...@swift.org> wrote:
> 
> Hey Jordan,
> 
> Thanks for the email! Very good point -- and I definitely felt weird 
> assigning "Swift 3" labels to tasks, considering it's not up to me to decide 
> what goes into Swift 3 or not. Still, I think it's helpful to see, at a 
> glance, what are the time-sensitive tasks for a given project. Ideally, the 
> tag would be named something like 
> "ItdBeSwellToGetThisDoneInTimeForSwift3IMHO" :) Seriously, though, ideas for 
> better label names would be very welcome!

Inside Apple we often use the term "nominated" for "I think this should go into 
release X, but it's not my call". Here that suggests labels like 
"Swift3Nomination".


-- 
Greg Parker     gpar...@apple.com <mailto:gpar...@apple.com>     Runtime 
Wrangler


_______________________________________________
swift-corelibs-dev mailing list
swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev

Reply via email to