Thanks - also the WithObjCType methods could have a nicer interface (make the type an enum of Character, take Any instead of an unsafe pointer).
Sent from my iPhone > On 26 Dec 2015, at 05:46, Philippe Hausler <phaus...@apple.com> wrote: > > Likely we will have to change that signature to instead of being NSSet and > Set<NSObject> respectively to be more compatible; however this will be an API > change. It might be good to mock up a swift translation layer for these APIs > to simulate what it would be like on Darwin if we altered these to be renamed > in swift and presented with a better interface via the SDK overlays. Note: > this will have to go through our evolution proposal system and be weighed in > by the component owners of NSKeyedArchiver and the API teams associated with > that to make such a change. > > In my opinion since AnyClass should be unique it by nature should be Hashable > - however I am not certain we can actually do that without language changes. > > Perhaps for the time being we could alter the signatures to be: > > public func decodeObjectOfClasses(classes: [AnyClass], forKey key: String) -> > AnyObject? > > public var allowedClasses: [AnyClass]? > > >> On Dec 25, 2015, at 2:01 AM, Luke Howard via swift-corelibs-dev >> <swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org> wrote: >> >> Looking at decodeObjectOfClasses/allowedClasses – what is the element type >> in the set of allowed classes? It seems like it should be AnyClass but that >> can’t be added to a Set because it doesn’t implement Hashable (nor to an >> NSSet because the initialiser unconditionally casts to NSObject). >> >> — Luke >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-corelibs-dev mailing list >> swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev >
_______________________________________________ swift-corelibs-dev mailing list swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev
