It's an interesting discussion to have (after the new year, of course.) I understand that we sometimes have to change ABIs because we can't fix problems otherwise. However, I don't recall seeing much/any discussion about this. If it appeared on a list that I didn't spot then cool. But any kind of ABI change in a stable branch deserves a little more discussion before its done.
The reason ath(4) 802.11n support isn't in -9 is because of the ABI changes I'd have to do to net80211 (at least) before I could put it in, and I want to make sure all of my changes are in place before I do (hopefully one, maybe two) large-scale changes. Adrian _______________________________________________ svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-stable-9 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-stable-9-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
