> On 6/22/17 4:02 AM, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote: > > > >> On Jun 22, 2017, at 00:35, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > ? > > > >> Please revert the breakout of the existing config files. I think that > >> splitting > >> up the conf files is too disruptive of a change (POLA) for stable branches. > > > > Done in r320229 and r320230. > > I haven't checked if this was merged to 11, but if so, I think they should > also > stay a single conf file in 11 for the same reason.
I believe it WAS merged to 10, since that didnt get gated by a request to RE@, can we please get the splitting of these files backed out of the stable/10 branch? > >> This was agreed to by other folks in the followup thread to the commits in > >> head that you continue to ignore. > > > > > >> In head please either fully split up the files or revert to a single file > >> (another part of that thread you continue to ignore). > > > > My eyes glazed over trying to read through all of the posts. I seem to > > have missed the point where a proposed change was made to split up the > > config files further. Could this please be summarized again? > > I think that having the files partially split up is the worst of both > worlds as folks writing config management rules, etc. have to use > different approaches depending on the rule. I think that is a headache > and would rather have the config either be all in a single file, or all > be split up into conf.d/ so that it is consistent. I also think that > when splitting up a conf file we should do it all at once so that there is > only one painful /etc merge instead of several of them. > > -- > John Baldwin > > -- Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org _______________________________________________ svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-stable-10 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-stable-10-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
