On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:29:44AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> writes: > > The interesting thing is the validator was there before my changes, and not > > changed at all in the process of adding validation, so depending on the > > command > > you were using your multibyte input for gecos may or may not have been > > rejected > > already! > > "pw useradd" worked fine in 10.1, so what exactly changed? >
some commands where calling pw_checknames, somewhere not, pw useradd was not so it din't try to validate the gecos input, others were. Bapt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
