On 4 April 2015 at 02:17, Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl> wrote: > 2015-04-04 11:16 GMT+02:00 Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl>: >> Couldn't this use calloc() instead? > > Oh, wait. This is the boot loader. The boot loader wouldn't > necessarily have a calloc() function.
.. why not? Wouldn't it be worth the code savings to have calloc versus malloc + bzero everywhere? -adrian _______________________________________________ svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-stable-10 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-stable-10-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
