06.06.2018 1:26, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >>> I find it often very useful to do >>> (cd src/etc/rc.d && make install) >>> Same for defaults and several other directories which in fact contains >>> non-editable content. Is this planned to keep working ? >> >> The short answer is, no. All rc.d scripts get moved to the src of the >> program they start. >> >> That said, if there is a big need for this, we can see about options to keep >> them working. >> >> What are you trying to accomplish when you do this? Just verify the rc.d >> scripts match your src tree? > > I avoid mergemaster/etcupdate and whatever else. rc.d and /etc/rc, > /etc/rc.subr /etc/rc.network are not suitable to etc, they are binaries > provided by the project not for the user editing. > > When upgrading the host, esp. on HEAD, i usually refresh scripts by this > procedure and avoid any editing and implied conflict resolution for real > configs. > > Not being able to easily install clean copies of these scripts would > be very inconvenient and time consuming.
I found that "mergemaster -iFUP" deals with unchanged files including mentioned rc* scripts just fine. That is, it automatically refreshes unchanged files without any silly questions just for change of $FreeBSD$. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
