On Jan 24, 2018 12:24 PM, "Conrad Meyer" <c...@freebsd.org> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:51 AM, Pedro Giffuni <p...@freebsd.org> wrote: > FWIW, I suggested a panic for M_WAITOK and returning NULL for M_NOWAIT, but > cem didn't like it because it was inconsistent. > > I think the current argument is more about the size/trigger than the > behavior though. Yeah. If an overflow happens in a path, we want to flag it -- regardless of whether that was a M_NOWAIT or M_WAITOK request. Which is why we should add check overflows for most of the no wait cases. They should be checked, but not primarily with mallocarray... Warner _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
