On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:38:09AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 13/11/2017 04:00, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:15:35PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> On 14/10/2017 21:38, Brooks Davis wrote:
> >>> Author: brooks
> >>> Date: Sat Oct 14 18:38:36 2017
> >>> New Revision: 324619
> >>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/324619
> >>>
> >>> Log:
> >>>   Switch procstat from subcommand flags to verbs
> >>>   
> >>>   - Use an enumerated value instead of separate flags for commands
> >>>   - Look for a verb if no command flag is set
> >>>   - Lookup the "xocontainer" value based on the command
> >>>   - Document the new command verbs in the man-page
> >>>   
> >>>   Submitted by:   kdrak...@zoho.com
> >>>   Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10916
> >>
> >> What's the new way of doing procstat -kk -a ?
> >>
> >> procstat -kk -a now crashes because cmd is NULL when 'k' option is 
> >> processed.
> >> procstat kstack and procstat kstack -v just produce the usage message 
> >> without
> >> telling any specific usage error.
> >> procstat kstack -a says that 'a' is an illegal option.
> > 
> > From the reading the manpage it should be: procstat -a kstack -v
> 
> This works, thank you.
> 
> > The crash is a regression.  Please file a bugreport.
> 
> This one line patch seems to fix the crash and procstat -kk -a is usable 
> again.
> Does it look okay to you?
> 
> --- a/usr.bin/procstat/procstat.c
> +++ b/usr.bin/procstat/procstat.c
> @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
>                       cmd = getcmd("tsignals");
>                       break;
>               case 'k':
> -                     if (cmd->cmd == procstat_kstack) {
> +                     if (cmd != NULL && cmd->cmd == procstat_kstack) {
>                               if ((procstat_opts & PS_OPT_VERBOSE) != 0)
>                                       usage();
>                               procstat_opts |= PS_OPT_VERBOSE;

Looks good to me.

-- Brooks

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to