That doesn't work either before or after this change. -Alan
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Conrad Meyer <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, not negative, just large uint64_t numbers that would be negative > as off_t (int64_t). > > E.g., dd if=/dev/kmem bs=1 iseek=0xfffff...foo count=8. I think we > would like that to work. I don't recall whether it does or not before > this change. > > Best, > Conrad > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Alan Somers <[email protected]> wrote: >> Nope. Do you mean negative offsets for the iseek argument? I didn't >> know you could do that. >> >> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Conrad Meyer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Alan, >>> >>> By any chance did you test this change with /dev/kmem and kernel >>> addresses ("negative" off_t values)? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Conrad _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
