On June 7, 2017 4:20:33 AM EDT, Alexander Leidinger <alexan...@leidinger.net> wrote: > >Quoting Allan Jude <allanj...@freebsd.org> (from Tue, 6 Jun 2017 >02:15:01 +0000 (UTC)): > >> Author: allanjude >> Date: Tue Jun 6 02:15:00 2017 >> New Revision: 319611 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/319611 >> >> Log: >> Jails: Optionally prevent jailed root from binding to privileged >ports >> >> You may now optionally specify allow.noreserved_ports to prevent >root >> inside a jail from using privileged ports (less than 1024) > >What about a different name than "noreserved_ports"? This is very >close to "nonreserverd_ports", and as such it's easy to get wrong the >first time. IMO "block_reserved_ports" and "noblock_reserved_ports" >(or another similar explicit wording) is less likely to get >misunderstood (please take potential lack of language learning skills >into account...). > >> Modified: head/sys/kern/kern_jail.c >> >============================================================================== >> --- head/sys/kern/kern_jail.c Tue Jun 6 02:03:22 2017 >> (r319610) >> +++ head/sys/kern/kern_jail.c Tue Jun 6 02:15:00 2017 >> (r319611) >> @@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ static char *pr_allow_names[] = { >> "allow.mount.fdescfs", >> "allow.mount.linprocfs", >> "allow.mount.linsysfs", >> + "allow.reserved_ports", >> }; >> const size_t pr_allow_names_size = sizeof(pr_allow_names); >> >> @@ -218,10 +219,11 @@ static char *pr_allow_nonames[] = { >> "allow.mount.nofdescfs", >> "allow.mount.nolinprocfs", >> "allow.mount.nolinsysfs", >> + "allow.noreserved_ports", > >Bye, >Alexander.
The option name is reserved_ports which allows root to bind to the ports. As with all jail options, the no prefix disables it. This feature is on by default for backwards compatibility. -- Allan Jude _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
