> On Mar 4, 2017, at 13:43, Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Bryan Drewery <bdrew...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> On 3/4/2017 12:20 PM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>>> -- Start of PGP signed section.
>>> [ Charset windows-1252 unsupported, converting... ]
>>>>> On 3/4/2017 7:34 AM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>>>>> What is ${.CURDIR:H:H} ?????  Yes that seems to work but now we are 
>>>>> obscuring
>>>>> ../.. into makefile syntax magic, probably not a grand idea.
>>>> It just trims off the last directory component.  This both reduces
>>>> namecache lookups, lessens the amount of data in a log, and makes
>>>> debugging a log simpler by not having a crazy path like:
>>>> /home/bdrewery/big/git/buildserver/sys/modules/usb/template/../../../dev/usb/template/usb_template.c
>>>> 
>>>> It's far simpler to understand and work with:
>>>> /home/bdrewery/big/git/buildserver/sys/dev/usb/template/usb_template.c
>>>> 
>>>> The only downside is it is slightly more obscure in a Makefile, but once
>>>> you know what :H is then it's not a problem.  This is why SRCTOP is even
>>>> better than this as it is far more clear than even :H and avoids the
>>>> ../../ problems.
>>> Lets do one or the other, but not both ${SRCTOP} and :H:H:H.  It appears
>>> that we now have a mix and mashed up some one way others the other.
>> 
>> That I can agree with. I would prefer to standardize on SRCTOP as :H is
>> too obscure without learning about make details.
> 
> :H is insane in 90% of the cases I've seen it used. Let's roll with
> SRCTOP everywhere we can. That's safer from directory motion anyway...

Ok, I have 3 votes for SRCTOP, so I'll implement the remaining change using 
SRCTOP (for usr.bin), and reimplement the previous changes using SRCTOP.

Thank you all for the input,
-Ngie
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to