On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 06:21:49AM +0000, Conrad E. Meyer wrote: > +/* > + * When ino_t becomes 64-bit, we can remove this definition in favor of > ino_t. > + */ > +#define cd_ino_t uint64_t > +
Why the type is defined and not typedef-ed ? Also, I do not think that it is good idea to rely on specific size of the special-purpose system types, like ino_t, even if it is only an intent. Both because the types can change, and because it reduces the usefulness of the code outside the FreeBSD content (our code is often taken into weird embedded systems), where system types might be different. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
