Because I'm stupid enough to not remember that we have code which is compiled only as module. So my standard 'make buildkernel -DNO_CLEAN -DNO_MODULES' is not a best option how to test this new code. And rest is only natural result of panic caused by 'I break a kernel build' and 'I have scheduled a meeting @work at now'.
You are right of course, I will fix it later today. Michal On 06.12.2016 23:01, John Baldwin wrote: > On Sunday, December 04, 2016 03:27:39 PM Michal Meloun wrote: >> Author: mmel >> Date: Sun Dec 4 15:27:39 2016 >> New Revision: 309531 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/309531 >> >> Log: >> Implement fake pmap_mapdev_attr() for ARMv6. >> This function is referenced, but never called from DRM2 code. Also, >> real behavior of pmap_mapdev_attr() in ARM world is unclear as we don't >> have any additional attribute for a device memory type. >> >> MFC after: 2 weeks > One more question: why not define this in pmap.c instead of an inline > function in the header file? (The inline bit seemed to have led to several > followups due to build breakage and the "fixes" require a fair bit of header > pollution.) > _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
