On Nov 25, 2016 12:27 AM, "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" <d...@des.no> wrote: > > Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdp...@gmail.com> writes: > > We have code review, we have some many ways for communication, even > > revert a commit if needed. > > No. This is the kind of mistake where the code will seem to work just > fine and end up in a release before a user suddenly discovers that they > have two instances of the same daemon running and trashing their data. > If I remember correctly, the last time someone touched flopen(), > everything worked except 'service mountd reload' stopped working. > > > Everybody can read the svn history. > > Yeah, but they don't. And before you say MAINTAINERS, they don't read > or respect that either. Believe me, I have years of experience cleaning > up after unapproved, unreviewed commits to code I maintain. Conversely, > another committer once reverted a commit they had reviewed and approved > because they thought I hadn't committed it and hit 'y' blindly when > patch told them it was already applied. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
Ok, I understand your frustration, and I apologize about my previous email, but you are a developer that most of people respect in this community. You definitely has voice to solve it in a different way. Best, _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
