On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 02:28:35 PM George V. Neville-Neil wrote: > Author: gnn > Date: Tue Aug 30 14:28:35 2016 > New Revision: 305066 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/305066 > > Log: > Update cryptotest for modern algorithms > > Reviewed by: cem > Sponsored by: Rubicon Communications, LLC (Netgate) > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7598
Doesn't removing 'static' result in a bunch of warnings from clang now since you don't have function prototypes? Assuming these functions aren't meant to be exposed as a library to other programs, static is more correct. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
