On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:42:56PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 07.08.2016 22:10, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:02:52PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > > >> On 07.08.2016 21:52, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >>>> Why you still not > >>>> send your opinion to the author? > >>>> > >>> > >>> I am not sure about suitable response from autor. > >>> May be project [FreeBSD] choise some compromise. > >> > >> IMHO blindly choosing some compromise without asking author's opinion > >> first will be unwise. I will be glad in case someone from secteam@ > >> discuss that with the author. Moreover, careless attempt to stay > >> compatible by any price can weak connections passed out of the server room. > >> > > > > In generaly I am accept this. > > For this specific case enforcing strong crypo like Internet filtering > > from suicide. > > > > BTW, there is at least one alternative. F.e. security/putty from ports > still support weak min DH 1024, diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 and even des > you need. I don't check others because I am too lazy.
Last time I am see (over six years ago) putty just don't work (my coworker try on Linux). I am to lazy check now. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
