On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 10:03:20AM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hello; > > [...] > Thank you for the reports, this type of things make nice cases for the > test suite. > > There were good reasons this patch was not meant for 11.0-RELEASE. Given > it's the second regression and I am not satisfied with the patch for the > first one, I will be reverting the change so we can look at the problems > integrally.
>From a software engineer point, I fully support this decision. sed(1) is very important part of FreeBSD's repertoire, and any changes to it must not be committed unless fully understood and well tested (on a personal note, not being satisfied with the patch for the first [regression] is already a good enough reason for a backout -- merely IMHO). Thank you. ./danfe _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
