On 18.07.16 22:37, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Well, this looks to me exactly what I am talking about. With this change > we are only allowing underlying provider to be *slighly* bigger than the > UFS size. So as I said it's pretty harmless to do so, or at least I
So, this isn't true. 1. You use abs() in the macro - it can be less or bigger. 2. fs_fsize is size of frag blocks, so use it as divider looks incorrect. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
