On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:19:56PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 06/02/16 13:14, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > + callout_reset(&rxq->rx_refill, hz/10, > > xn_alloc_rx_buffers_callout, > > + rxq); > > Maybe use callout_reset_curcpu() to take advantage of callout's SMP > capabilities ?
Yes, that's fine. But what's the benefit of it? I don't really care whether the callout is run on the current CPU or not. Is callout_reset_curcpu cheaper than callout_reset? Roger. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
