On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:22:55AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 05/27/16 10:11, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 09:42:24AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > >> We cannot use the "bool" type in userspace at least, because > >> sizeof(bool) depends on the compiler. So the interface must use an > >> integer type at least, possibly uint8_t like now. > > > > What do you mean ? There are ABIs, and we expect all used compilers to > > follow common arch ABI. Old psABIs date back to time where _Bool > > did not existed yet, but now it is ubiquitious. E.g. both i386 and > > amd64 require _Bool have a representation by single byte, with the > > byte alignment. > > > > Can you give exact examples of the inconsistencies, on any platform, > > regardless of our tier ? > > > > Hi, > > I was reading this article: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4897844/is-sizeofbool-defined > > And is says: > sizeof(bool) is not required to be 1.
It is clear that the answers you referenced talk about requirements of the C standard. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
