> On 26 Apr 2016, at 23:18, Shawn Webb <shawn.w...@hardenedbsd.org> wrote: > Was secteam@ even involved, then? Seems like a user-facing kernel buffer > overflow ought to have involved secteam@. > No, it wasn’t. This bug had been open for quite a while, and I just happend to see the report and look at it.
> Also, the differential revision link you posted is incorrect. You’re right, copy/paste from the wrong phab e-mail. https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5977 <https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5977> is the right one. Regards, Kristof
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
