On 13/01/2016 01:10, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2016-01-12 20:05, NGie Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Ian Lepore <i...@freebsd.org> wrote:
...
For several reasons. The fact that gcc isn't the default compiler
doesn't mean that it's okay for code to not compile with gcc; it's
still a supported compiler for arm.
Agreed. It also makes things messier when MFCing changes if it doesn't
work with gcc.
Thanks,
-NGie
If it is a supported compiler, maybe we need a tinderbox option that
compiles ARM with gcc, to catch cases like this.
Yer we really should.
I explicitly ran tinderbox on these changes in order to ensure all the
bases where covered, if there are additional options not run by
tinderbox but are supported then we really need add them otherwise we're
just assuming everyone knows to manually test additional configurations
which is never going to work.
Regards
Steve
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
