On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 11/09/15 22:17, Bruce Evans wrote:
...
This shouldn't compile either.
static int
-sysctl_root_handler_locked(struct sysctl_oid *oid, void *arg1, intptr_t
arg2,
+sysctl_root_handler_locked(struct sysctl_oid *oid, void *arg1, intmax_t
arg2,
struct sysctl_req *req, struct rm_priotracker *tracker)
Given that the second argument is sometimes used for pointers, maybe we
should keep it intptr_t. Or add a compile time assert that sizeof(intmax) >=
sizeof(intptr_t) which I think doesn't hold?
Then it wouldn't be large enough to hold int64_t on i386 or intmax_t on
all arches. intmax_t is already not large enough to hold uintmax_t.
intmax_t can hold more than intptr_t, but its size and rank may be smaller.
See another reply.
Bruce
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
