On 10/20/15 23:42, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 10/20/2015 1:38 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Author: kib
Date: Tue Oct 20 20:38:20 2015
New Revision: 289664
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/289664
Log:
Trim spaces at end of line to record the proper commit message for
r289660:
I really think we should just do a full revert and recommit in these
cases, and not even a forced commit. Neither this commit or a forced
commit will show in 'svn blame' or even during a bisect. It really just
becomes luck to find the right commit noting the message. IMHO 'svn
blame' is more important than some extra churn in 'svn log' or email. It
does add more steps in 'svn blame' but it ends up giving the right
message more obviously.
I'm not asking to redo this commit now, but I think we should have a
standard of just recommitting to fix mistakes.
Why
svn propedit svn:log --revprop -r289660
Is not used?
AFAIR this was disabled, because revprop edit can't be synced with CVS. But
there is no official CVS repo for a log time.
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
