> On Jul 31, 2015, at 10:31 AM, John-Mark Gurney <j...@funkthat.com> wrote: > > Ed Schouten wrote this message on Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:24 +0200: >> Maybe it would make more sense to just remove this manual page? >> >> It looks like there are already some pieces of code in our source tree >> that use _Static_assert(), which is good. Maybe it would be better to >> to leave CTASSERT() undocumented, so that it becomes less likely that >> new code uses this interface. > > I plan on documenting _Static_assert, and once that is documented > for both userland and kernel, then we can mark this deprecated…
We generally don’t document built-in language features. Just add a note to the CTASSERT man page that says use it instead. > Do we support linking man pages between man3/man9? or should it just > be in a comment? and in one section? Put them in section 9 with a note saying they work for user land. There’s maybe a dozen that apply to both. We’ve historically not tried to share them. Warner
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
