On 28 Jun 2015, at 10:57, Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 01:44:21AM -0700, NGie Cooper wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> >> wrote: >> ... >>> Not at all I have this on a both where I haven't yet r284898 iirc it is like >>> this since the beginning I do not remember seeing those ld scripts with >>> absolute >>> path. >> >> $ cat /usr/lib/libc.so >> /* $FreeBSD$ */ >> GROUP ( /lib/libc.so.7 /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a /usr/lib/libssp_nonshared.a >> ) >> $ what -q /boot/GENERIC.r283337+9c333ed/kernel >> FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #4 r283337+9c333ed(isilon-atf): Tue May 26 >> 21:49:09 PDT 2015 > > Yes you are right, I was looking at the wrong place.
What is actually the perceived problem with having paths in those linker scripts? If you use --sysroot, the libraries are searched relative to that sysroot, right? (And yes, I know our gcc's sysroot implementation is broken. So please fix that instead. :-) -Dimitry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
