On 18 May 2015 at 10:11, Mathieu Arnold <m...@absolight.fr> wrote: > > Mmmm, if this can be done only for base, and not for ports, sure, but ports > need to be able to add patches with CRLF endings, because upstream software > comes in all flavors, including CRLF files we need to be able to patch.
Sure it could, we could configure it however we want. Note that we'll likely need to support CRLF in base anyway - one obvious example is test cases for CRLF handling in various tools. I'd imagine we could add an SVN keyword like fbsd:crlf=yes, along the lines of fbsd:nokeywords=yes. Do you know how common CRLF or partial CRLF files are in the ports tree? If it's only a handful that scheme could work there too. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
