> On Apr 25, 2015, at 1:59 PM, Dmitry Morozovsky <ma...@rinet.ru> wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Apr 2015, Scott Long via svn-src-all wrote: > >>>> True, it's not actually odd, it's just surprising the first time >>>> one comes across it. >>>> >>>> Also, I goofed in the text: >>>> >>>>>> With the flexible array, (sizeof(struct uma_cache)) is going to be >>>>>> 32 bytes smaller than without it. >>>> >>>> It's `struct uma_zone` that shrinks by (potentially) more than one >>>> would expect. (The uma_cache struct is itself 32 bytes and is not >>>> changed, so the args.size value should be the same -- implying that >>>> some OTHER "sizeof(struct uma_zone)" is where things are going wrong.) >>>> >>> vm_mem_init() called before uma init. unfortunately, we have not seen >>> a proper info about panic from scottl > >> Too early in boot to get a crashdump. > > ... and even console not set up enough to have a backtrace/some debugging > printfs displayed?
Maybe you didn’t see the backtrace that was printed and included? What debugging printfs should I have predicted that you would want? Scott _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
