On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 03:10:50AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: J> On 2/13/15 4:05 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: J> > Hi! J> > J> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:20:34PM +0000, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: J> > T> Author: glebius J> > T> Date: Thu Feb 12 22:20:34 2015 J> > T> New Revision: 278640 J> > T> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/278640 J> > T> J> > T> Log: J> > T> Revise default limit for maximum of netgraph data items. J> > T> With modern internet speeds the limit can be reached even J> > T> on a single L2TP link. J> > J> > Actually any ng_item of data type requires an mbuf to be connected J> > to it, and thus I suggest to use mbuf limits to drive ng_item limits. J> > J> > If we got an item leak with mbufs being properly freed, then we've J> > got a bug to fix, and any limit won't work in long run time. I never J> > evidenced such a bug, but there complaints on hitting limit at J> > traffic bursts. As said, with previous 512 item limit I experienced J> > that even on a laptop. J> > J> > Any objections on removing the limit, guys? J> maybe derived from it, but not the same number. J> maybe change the systctl to define the relationship?
I guess you want to have ng_items limit smaller than mbuf limit? How smaller? What problem are we actually guarding against putting this limit? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
