Never mind, apologies, thought this was i386+amd64. I'm going to guess anything emulating amd64 has pci NICs in it. :)
On Jan 26, 2015, at 9:21 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Don't have a strong opinion on this because I'm not in the know lately, but > was wondering: > > 1) if we wanted to keep NE1000/2000 support for FreeBSD in emulators? > Probably not I assume? > 2) Does Linux nuke these devices? why/why-not? > > > On Jan 25, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > >> >>> On Jan 25, 2015, at 7:54 AM, Garrett Cooper <yaneurab...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Jan 25, 2015, at 04:43, Sergey Kandaurov <pluk...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 25 January 2015 at 15:02, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <d...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>>> Author: des >>>>> Date: Sun Jan 25 12:02:38 2015 >>>>> New Revision: 277694 >>>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277694 >>>>> >>>>> Log: >>>>> Remove ISA NICs. Anyone still using these on amd64 can build their >>>>> own kernel. >>>>> >>>>> Modified: >>>>> head/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC >>>> >>>> If so, what about i386? (I'd rather not pc98) >>>> What about device isa in DEFAULTS? >>> >>> isa is still needed in some scenarios. I just don't remember the full >>> details offhand (something about internal buses iirc... And IPMI for >>> starters...) >> >> "isa” in this context should be read as “mainbus” not as “ISA slots”. You >> can’t >> remove it without some significant work, and even then the interface changes >> to long established interfaces isn’t worth the pain. >> >> Warner >> >> > _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
