On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:52 PM, John Nielsen <li...@jnielsen.net> wrote:
> Bryan- > > On Oct 10, 2014, at 12:09 AM, Bryan Venteicher <bry...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > Author: bryanv > > Date: Fri Oct 10 06:08:59 2014 > > New Revision: 272886 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/272886 > > > > Log: > > Add context pointer and source address to the UDP tunnel callback > > > > These are needed for the forthcoming vxlan implementation. The context > > pointer means we do not have to use a spare pointer field in the inpcb, > > and the source address is required to populate vxlan's forwarding table. > > > > While I highly doubt there is an out of tree consumer of the UDP > > tunneling callback, this change may be a difficult to eventually MFC. > > I noticed this comment while doing an MFC of vxlan to my local tree. Do > you think an MFC to 10-STABLE of this change (and vxlan generally) will be > feasible? Is there precedent for ABI changes like this being sanctioned? > Could symbol versioning help? > > I'd like to get some consensus on whether this commit is OK to MFC. With this commit, vxlan should be an easy to MFC. > > Phabricator: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D383 > > Reviewed by: gnn > > > > Modified: > > head/sys/netinet/sctputil.c > > head/sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c > > head/sys/netinet/udp_var.h > > head/sys/netinet6/udp6_usrreq.c > > Thanks, > > JN > > _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
