On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 01:33:41PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 03:59:11PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Steve Kargl < > > s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 08:34:56PM +0000, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > > > Author: ngie > > > > Date: Fri Jan 2 20:34:55 2015 > > > > New Revision: 276565 > > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/276565 > > > > > > > > Log: > > > > Remove gnu/ info pages to unbreak the build with MK_GCC != no, etc > > > > > > > > > > Does this mean that FreeBSD is now shipping utilities without > > > documentation? > > > > > > > I'm pretty sure we've been doing that for a long, long time. > > > > Note that MK_GCC=no is the default on head for the tier-1 platforms. > > > > Yeah, I know what the default is for tier-1, which is somewhat > irrelevant to my question. bapt@ has removed info pages (and > Garrett seems to have cleanup after bapt). Noting that FreeBSD > has more than just tier-1, the question remains. Is FreeBSD > now shipping utilities without proper documentation? > The man pages remains, for binutils for examples, the manpages were generated out of the texinfo files meaning the manpage contains the same amount of informations
Bapt
pgprlD_q394nr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
