On Dec 31, 2014, at 21:12, Garrett Cooper <yaneurab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2014, at 20:44, Garrett Cooper <yaneurab...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Dec 31, 2014, at 20:25, Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> wrote:
>
> …
>
>>> This change is wrong. bsd.sys.mk was eliminated on purpose, dammit.
>>
>> Sorry. Should have asked first. Now the build is broken on all architectures
>> :/. What next?
>
> Also, that code has been in there for over a decade. It seems a bit dangerous
> to remove it without at least a ports -exp or make tinderbox run…
Hmmm… would it make sense to disable clang warnings from within bsd.sys.mk,
like we do with sparc64?
Thanks!
117 .if ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "sparc64"
118 # Don't emit .cfi directives, since we must use GNU as on sparc64, for now.
119 CFLAGS.clang+= -fno-dwarf2-cfi-asm
120 .endif # SPARC64
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
