On 12/01/14 16:29, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On Dec 1, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Hans Petter Selasky <h...@selasky.org> wrote:
On 12/01/14 16:19, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
It makes little sense to have a rw sysctl that only takes effect "some times".
This violates POLA at the expense of making code appear cleaner. Expectation is that
writable sysctls take
Hi,
I think you are missing a new feature in 11-current, that if you add
"CTLFLAG_TUN" to even dynamic sysctls, they get initialized from the
enviroment, if any. That way you can just skip the TUNABLE_INT_FETCH() stuff!
Ok I can probably switch to that.
Any objection if I mfc this feature to -stable if it does what I need?
Hi,
No objections from me at least, but it might require some work from your
side, because there was a lot of cleanup about removing duplicate
definitions, like static SYSCTLS which have already CTLFLAG_TUN and a
TUNABLE fetch statement, which makes the variable init twice. Just look
at the revision history for "kern/kern_sysctl.c" in 11-current.
--HPS
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
