On 08 Nov 2014, at 16:03 , Gleb Smirnoff <gleb...@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 03:06:20PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> B> > Modified: head/sys/net/if.c
> B> > 
> ==============================================================================
> B> > --- head/sys/net/if.c    Sat Nov  8 06:43:33 2014        (r274273)
> B> > +++ head/sys/net/if.c    Sat Nov  8 07:23:01 2014        (r274274)
> B> > @@ -265,13 +265,12 @@ ifnet_byindex_ref(u_short idx)
> B> >  * Allocate an ifindex array entry; return 0 on success or an error on
> B> >  * failure.
> B> >  */
> B> > -static int
> B> > -ifindex_alloc_locked(u_short *idxp)
> B> > +static u_short
> B> 
> B> That feels like going backwards;  we should really make sure  we can 
> support ifindexes >> 64k
> 
> This isn't backwards, since if_index was u_short before the commit.
> 
> I will take into account your wish and see if we can enlarge if_index.

Yeah, I think we fixed most of the APIs to be able to extend it and brooks had 
a spare a while ago I think.

Last time this was discussed the leaning was to go straight to uint64_t to 
avoid any problems for the next two decades ;-)

/bz

— 
Bjoern A. Zeeb             "Come on. Learn, goddamn it.", WarGames, 1983

_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to