On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 11:37:57PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Konstantin Belousov > <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 10:17:26PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: > >> I think that your initial patch (what is in head now) is a better approach. > >> I would just make it a lockinit() flag to make it less alien to the KPI. > >> > > > > Ok. > > > > Can you explain what would the proposed lockinit() flag do ? What should > > it change comparing with the current code ? > > You now provide LK_NODDLKTREAT on a call basis. > The lockinit() flag would embed this into the lock attribute and make > it always real, without the need for the callers to provide > LK_NODDLKTREAT on a call basis.
Am I reading your proposal right ? Do you mean, that for all vnodes, I should disable exclusive starvation avoidance at all ? I completely disagree with this. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
