Author: tuexen
Date: Sat Oct 25 09:25:29 2014
New Revision: 273634
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/273634

Log:
  Fix a use of an uninitialized variable by makeing sure
  that sctp_med_chunk_output() always initialized the reason_code
  instead of relying on the caller.
  The variable is only used for debugging purpose.
  This issue was reported by Peter Bostroem from Google.
  
  MFC after: 3 days

Modified:
  head/sys/netinet/sctp_output.c

Modified: head/sys/netinet/sctp_output.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/netinet/sctp_output.c      Sat Oct 25 07:20:46 2014        
(r273633)
+++ head/sys/netinet/sctp_output.c      Sat Oct 25 09:25:29 2014        
(r273634)
@@ -6748,7 +6748,7 @@ sctp_sendall_iterator(struct sctp_inpcb 
        if (do_chunk_output)
                sctp_chunk_output(inp, stcb, SCTP_OUTPUT_FROM_USR_SEND, 
SCTP_SO_NOT_LOCKED);
        else if (added_control) {
-               int num_out = 0, reason = 0, now_filled = 0;
+               int num_out, reason, now_filled = 0;
                struct timeval now;
                int frag_point;
 
@@ -7814,6 +7814,7 @@ sctp_med_chunk_output(struct sctp_inpcb 
        int quit_now = 0;
 
        *num_out = 0;
+       *reason_code = 0;
        auth_keyid = stcb->asoc.authinfo.active_keyid;
        if ((asoc->state & SCTP_STATE_SHUTDOWN_PENDING) ||
            (asoc->state & SCTP_STATE_SHUTDOWN_RECEIVED) ||
@@ -9945,7 +9946,7 @@ sctp_chunk_output(struct sctp_inpcb *inp
         */
        struct sctp_association *asoc;
        struct sctp_nets *net;
-       int error = 0, num_out = 0, tot_out = 0, ret = 0, reason_code = 0;
+       int error = 0, num_out, tot_out = 0, ret = 0, reason_code;
        unsigned int burst_cnt = 0;
        struct timeval now;
        int now_filled = 0;
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to